
Scale of the Eradication Effort Shocks Observers (Image Credits: Pixabay)
Catalina Island—California Department of Fish and Wildlife approved a permit last week allowing the Catalina Island Conservancy to eliminate the island’s entire mule deer population over the next five years.[1][2]
Scale of the Eradication Effort Shocks Observers
The nonprofit organization that manages 88 percent of the 48,000-acre island will deploy 10 to 12 trained professional hunters starting as early as September 2026. These specialists will use rifles in ground-based operations under strict safety protocols to remove roughly 1,800 to 2,000 mule deer.[1][2] Conservancy leaders described the step as essential for long-term habitat recovery. Lauren Dennhardt, senior director of conservation, stated, “Nobody wants to kill animals. Obviously, that’s not why we get into conservation work.”[1]
Harvested meat will support the California Condor Recovery Program by feeding endangered birds, while remote carcasses decompose naturally to benefit scavengers like bald eagles and foxes. A final locals-only hunting season will occur in fall 2026 before operations begin in earnest. The conservancy scrapped an earlier helicopter-shooting proposal in 2024 following public concerns.[3]
Deer Introduction and Lasting Damage
Landowners brought mule deer to the island in the 1920s and 1930s as a game species, starting with just 10 animals. Without natural predators, their numbers exploded to over 2,000 by 1949 and have fluctuated between 500 and 1,800 since.[1][4] The deer browse native vegetation indiscriminately, preventing recovery of rare species like the Catalina Island mountain mahogany, potentially North America’s rarest tree.
This browsing favors invasive grasses that dry out quickly and fuel intense wildfires, erode soils, and hinder groundwater recharge. Peer-reviewed studies link the deer to degraded habitats that threaten endemic species such as the island fox and Catalina shrew. Annual hunting since 2010 has culled over 200 deer yearly, yet populations rebound rapidly.[2]
Unlikely Alliance Fuels Backlash
Opposition unites hunters, animal welfare advocates, and residents who view the deer as cherished icons after nearly a century on the island. Los Angeles County Supervisor Janice Hahn urged rejection of the permit, calling it “a drastic and inhumane approach” that disregards community values.[1] Groups like Safari Club International and In Defense of Animals decry the plan, with a petition garnering nearly 23,000 signatures.[5]
- Hunters argue for sustained populations to preserve rare Southern California big-game opportunities.
- Animal rights organizations label the cull cruel and unnecessary.
- Locals emphasize the deer’s role in island identity alongside bison herds.
- L.A. County Fire Chief Anthony Marrone warned that removing deer grazers could boost chaparral fuels and wildfire risks.
Rejected Paths Pave Way for Lethal Action
Officials evaluated multiple alternatives before approving the permit. Relocation efforts failed elsewhere, with 85 percent mortality in one past case due to stress and disease. Sterilization and contraceptives proved logistically unfeasible for thousands of free-roaming deer.[3][4]
Fencing, predator introduction, and expanded hunting all fell short in modeling. Scott Morrison of The Nature Conservancy noted, “Catalina Island can have either a functional, biodiverse and resilient ecosystem or it can have deer. It cannot have both.”[4] Past successes, like eradicating 5,000 pigs on nearby Santa Cruz Island, bolster confidence in the approach.
| Alternative | Reason Rejected |
|---|---|
| Relocation | High mortality from stress and disease |
| Sterilization/Contraceptives | Impractical for large, wild population |
| Expanded Hunting | Insufficient to control rebound |
| Fencing | Not scalable island-wide |
Key Takeaways
- Deer removal enables native plant restoration and wildfire mitigation.
- Operations prioritize safety and utilize carcasses beneficially.
- Phased habitat work starts in fenced pilot areas this year.
The approval clears a path for “Operation Protect Catalina Island,” blending deer removal with invasive plant control, seed banking, and native replanting in phases. Conservancy leaders hail it as a transformative investment in the island’s future, echoing recoveries on other Channel Islands. As hunters gear up and ecologists prepare, the debate underscores tough choices in conservation. What do you think of this plan? Share in the comments.