Epstein Survivors’ Resolute Presence at Trump’s State of the Union Demands Full File Release

By Matthias Binder
‘We’re not going away’: Epstein survivors send message at State of the Union (Featured Image)

Pre-Address Press Conference Sets Defiant Tone (Image Credits: Nypost.com)

Washington – More than a dozen survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse filled guest seats in the House chamber during President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address on Tuesday, underscoring their ongoing push for unredacted government files related to the disgraced financier’s crimes.[1][2]

Pre-Address Press Conference Sets Defiant Tone

Hours before the speech, survivors gathered with Democratic lawmakers for a news conference hosted by the Democratic Women’s Caucus. They voiced frustration over the Trump administration’s handling of Epstein documents. Dani Bensky, a guest of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, questioned the lack of investigations into individuals named in the files.[1][3]

Amanda Roberts, sister-in-law of the late Virginia Roberts Giuffre, urged the nation not to ignore their plight. “Don’t look away from us. Do not look away from Virginia,” she declared.[2] Lawmakers amplified these calls, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries praising survivor advocacy for transparency. The event highlighted a coordinated effort to leverage the Capitol spotlight.

Prominent Survivors Among Democratic Guests

Several lawmakers extended invitations to specific survivors, each carrying personal histories of trauma. Rep. Ro Khanna brought Haley Robson, who endured trafficking by Epstein starting at age 16. Annie Farmer, hosted by Rep. Robert Garcia, criticized the Justice Department for mishandling victim information.[1][4]

Other notable attendees included Jess Michaels with Rep. James Walkinshaw, Lisa Phillips standing in for Rep. Maxine Dexter, and Marina Lacerda as Rep. Jeffries’ guest. Family members of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who died by suicide last year, also attended courtesy of Reps. Jamie Raskin and Suhas Subramanyam. These choices symbolized broader solidarity.[5][2]

  • Haley Robson (Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif.)
  • Dani Bensky (Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.)
  • Annie Farmer (Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif.)
  • Lisa Phillips (Rep. Maxine Dexter, D-Ore.)
  • Jess Michaels (Rep. James Walkinshaw, D-Va.)
  • Sky and Amanda Roberts (Reps. Jamie Raskin and Suhas Subramanyam)

Core Demands Center on Epstein Transparency Act

The survivors targeted the Epstein Transparency Act, which mandates file releases but has seen significant redactions. Lisa Phillips vowed persistence: “We will keep coming back again and again until all the Epstein files have been released… We are not going away. We are not fading into silence.”[2] Critics accused the Justice Department of protecting powerful figures despite international probes advancing.

Rep. Khanna framed the invitations as a challenge to a “two-tiered system of justice.” Democrats wore pins reading “Stand with Survivors, Release the Files” during the address. Some members boycotted the speech to attend an alternative rally, redirecting tickets to survivors.[1]

Cross-Party Echoes and Ongoing Fight

While primarily a Democratic initiative, Rep. Nancy Mace described the survivors’ attendance as “courageous.”[6] President Trump has defended the partial releases, stating it was time to move on. Survivors and allies rejected this, insisting full accountability remains elusive.

The chamber presence served as a stark reminder amid policy discussions. It elevated personal stories against institutional delays.

Key Takeaways

  • Over a dozen survivors attended as guests of more than 12 Democratic lawmakers.
  • Primary demand: Unredacted release of millions of withheld Epstein files.
  • Pre-event presser featured vows like “We are not going away,” signaling sustained pressure.

This display of resolve during a national moment reinforces survivors’ determination to break silence on Epstein’s network. Lawmakers and advocates vow continued scrutiny. What steps should follow to ensure full transparency? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Exit mobile version