Every few years, the Academy hands its top prize to a film that leaves people scratching their heads. Sometimes the confusion shows up right away, on Oscar night itself. Other times it builds slowly, as a movie ages badly while its losing rivals keep growing in stature.
No ranking of this kind is scientific, and taste always sneaks in. Still, a handful of winners come up again and again when critics and film historians compare the Academy’s choices with the films that lost. Here are seven of the most frequently cited, taken in roughly chronological order.
The Greatest Show on Earth (1952)

Cecil B. DeMille’s circus epic won Best Picture at the ceremony held in early 1953. It beat High Noon and The Quiet Man, two films that have enjoyed much stronger reputations ever since. That alone is enough to keep it on most lists of questionable winners.
Critics tend to describe it as big, colorful and shallow. The circus footage is impressive spectacle, but the melodrama around it feels thin. Its win is usually read as the Academy rewarding scale and showmanship over craft.
Around the World in 80 Days (1956)

Mike Todd’s travelogue, adapted from the Jules Verne novel, took the top prize for 1956. It won over Giant, The Ten Commandments, The King and I and Friendly Persuasion. Its main selling point was its sheer spectacle, along with a parade of celebrity cameos.
Looking back, the film plays more like a lavish tour than a story with real stakes. Modern critics often point out that its appeal was tied to the novelty of the roadshow era. Once that novelty faded, so did much of the argument for calling it the year’s best.
Chariots of Fire (1981)

This British sports drama about runners at the 1924 Olympics is well made, and Vangelis’s synthesizer score is unforgettable. The complaint is about who it beat. The 1981 field included Reds, On Golden Pond, Atlantic City and Raiders of the Lost Ark.
Raiders in particular is now regarded as a landmark of popular filmmaking. Chariots of Fire is more often described as a pleasant, earnest film than a great one. Its win is remembered as a safe pick in a competitive year.
Driving Miss Daisy (1989)

Bruce Beresford’s gentle drama about an elderly Southern woman and her Black chauffeur won Best Picture even though Beresford wasn’t nominated for Best Director. That mismatch is one of the details critics point to first. The competition included Born on the Fourth of July, My Left Foot, Dead Poets Society and Field of Dreams.
Partner offer
Over time, the film has drawn criticism for its softened, comfortable view of race relations in the American South. Its performances are widely praised, but the storytelling is seen as cautious. Many now read the win as the Academy choosing reassurance over challenge.
Shakespeare in Love (1998)

This witty period comedy took seven Oscars, including Best Picture, and beat Saving Private Ryan in one of the most talked about upsets in Oscar history. It’s charming and clever, and few people call it a bad film. The debate is whether it deserved to outrank Spielberg’s war drama.
Much of the discussion centers on the aggressive awards campaign run by Miramax and Harvey Weinstein. That backstory has only grown more uncomfortable with time. As a result, the win is often treated as a case study in campaigning rather than pure merit.
Crash (2005)

Paul Haggis’s ensemble drama about racial tension in Los Angeles beat Brokeback Mountain, which many had expected to win. Nominees that year also included Capote, Munich and Good Night, and Good Luck. Crash is frequently named the weakest winner of the twenty-first century in critic polls and retrospectives.
The main criticism is that its coincidences and speeches feel heavy handed. Brokeback Mountain, by contrast, has been reappraised as a landmark of mainstream romance. The gap between the two reputations keeps the argument alive.
Green Book (2018)

Peter Farrelly’s road movie about pianist Don Shirley and his driver Tony Lip won Best Picture over Roma, The Favourite, BlacKkKlansman and Black Panther. It also won for Mahershala Ali’s supporting performance and for its original screenplay. The performances were widely admired, yet the top prize surprised many observers.
Critics argued that it told a familiar racial reconciliation story mainly through the white character’s point of view. Members of Shirley’s family also disputed how the film portrayed him. Those objections have followed the movie ever since its win.
Where the List Ends

These seven films share a pattern: each won in a year with stronger or more adventurous rivals, and each is remembered as much for who it beat as for what it achieved. Not one of them is universally hated, and several have real admirers. Their place on this list comes from comparison, and that comparison is still the reason critics keep bringing them up.
Partner offer
Planning a trip to Vegas?
Compare hotel rates and show tickets on VEGAS.com.