Laura Ingraham presses Trump on whether or not he’d defy a court docket order

Fox Information host Laura Ingraham pressed President Trump on Tuesday about whether or not he would defy a court docket order he disagreed with amid a conflict between his administration and a federal choose over flights deporting Venezuelan migrants.

Ingraham famous that the Trump administration’s choice to hold out the deportation flights regardless of a choose’s order directing the flights be rotated has sparked considerations from critics that the president would defy court docket orders he didn’t like.

“Well I think that, number one, nobody’s been through more courts than I have. I think nobody knows the courts better than I have … and what they’ve done to me — I’ve had the worst judges. I’ve had crooked judges,” Trump stated.

“But going forward would you defy a court order? We all know that,” Ingraham interjected.

“I never did defy a court order,” Trump stated.

“And you wouldn’t in the future?” Ingraham requested.

“No, you can’t do that,” Trump stated. “However, we have bad judges. We have very bad judges. These are judges that shouldn’t be allowed. I think at a certain point, you have to look at what do you do when you have a rogue judge.”

Trump earlier Tuesday referred to as for the impeachment of U.S. District Courtroom Decide James Boasberg, who over the weekend ordered flights carrying Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador to be rotated. The administration has stated the flights had been already out of U.S. territory on the time, whereas additionally suggesting Boasberg didn’t have the authority to intervene within the matter.

Boasberg is unlikely to be impeached, as it might require a majority within the Home and a two-thirds majority within the Senate.

Nonetheless, the furor over Boasberg’s ruling elicited a uncommon public assertion from Supreme Courtroom Chief Justice John Roberts.

“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose,” Roberts stated.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Exit mobile version