Challenger to Judge who ruled over Donald Trump library case reports “00K raised in first 30 days – Image for illustrative purposes only (Image credits: Pixabay)
Miami-Dade County residents seeking fairer court proceedings now have a clear choice in the Group 67 Circuit Court contest. Destiny Alvarez, a young lawyer mounting a bid against incumbent Judge Mavel Ruiz, announced she raised over $100,000 in her campaign’s first month. The figure underscores growing dissatisfaction with Ruiz’s handling of a prominent case tied to a proposed Donald Trump presidential library, where an appeals court recently flagged signs of bias.
Alvarez filed her paperwork on April 1, kicking off a race that could reshape local judicial priorities. Her rapid fundraising success highlights support from community leaders and legal circles eager for change. Official reports for the quarter will not surface until June 10, leaving her claim as the latest benchmark in a contest already drawing statewide eyes.
Controversy from the Trump Library Land Dispute
Last fall, Judge Ruiz temporarily halted Miami Dade College’s transfer of downtown property earmarked for the Trump library. Local activist Marvin Dunn filed the challenge, prompting Ruiz to impose a $150,000 bond requirement. The college’s trustees later held a public vote, leading Ruiz to dismiss the case in December.
Trouble arose when lawyers for the college sought Ruiz’s removal, citing her post-hearing hug of Dunn and remarks about his finances. An appellate panel, including Judges Ivan Fernandez, Monic Gordo, and Thomas Logue, ruled the actions created a well-founded fear of unfairness for future hearings. The decision barred Ruiz from reconsidering Dunn’s motion, amplifying calls for new leadership in the courtroom.
Alvarez Emerges as Formidable Opponent
Destiny Alvarez, 30, brings a fresh resume to the race. She serves as managing partner at the Coral Gables firm Goede DeBoest & Cross, a role she assumed last October after joining in 2022. Earlier stops included associate work at GrayRobinson, a gubernatorial fellowship at the Florida Department of Transportation, and a judicial externship under federal Judge Amanda Sansone in Tampa.
A University of Florida graduate and former president of the Florida Blue Key honor society, Alvarez switched her voter registration to Miami after years in Collier and Alachua counties. Her Republican affiliation adds a partisan undercurrent to the nominally nonpartisan race. Campaign materials portray her as committed to accessible, community-rooted justice.
“From day one, this campaign has been about restoring trust, strengthening our courts, and ensuring every person who walks into a courtroom is treated with fairness and respect,” Alvarez stated.
Fundraising Edge Signals Voter Priorities
Alvarez’s $100,000 haul in just 30 days outstrips Ruiz’s reported $70,000, collected mostly from lawyers and firms since last July. Donors to Ruiz included Greenberg Traurig, North Miami City Manager Theresa Therilus, and attorneys like Anita Margot Moss and Harley Tropin. Alvarez framed her milestone as proof of a “growing coalition of community leaders, legal professionals, and residents.”
| Candidate | Funds Raised | Period Covered |
|---|---|---|
| Destiny Alvarez | Over $100,000 | April 1–30, 2026 |
| Mavel Ruiz | Nearly $70,000 | July 2025–present |
Ruiz secured her seat in 2014 by defeating an incumbent and won re-election in 2020 with a comfortable margin. Yet a 2019 reprimand from the Florida Supreme Court lingers: she and four other judges endorsed a contractor during a state bidding process, breaching ethical standards. The group admitted the misstep created an improper appearance.
Path Forward in a High-Stakes Primary
With only two candidates, the August 18 primary will decide the winner outright. Judicial races often hinge on local networks, but the Trump library saga has elevated this one. Alvarez’s early momentum could pressure Ruiz to address bias concerns head-on.
For Miami-Dade’s legal community and everyday litigants, the outcome carries real weight. A shift at the bench might restore confidence shaken by recent rulings, while continuity offers experience amid complex dockets. As filings loom, residents watch how fundraising translates to votes in a race testing judicial accountability.
